Introduction to Implied, Local and Stochastic Volatility
Implied Volatility - Ito's Lemma
Applying Ito to the Hedging Portfolio
Risk-Neutralization and No-Arbitrage
Implied Volatility (Smiles and Skews)
Coupled SDEs for Stochastic Volatility
Risk-Neutralization and No-Arbitrage
Exact Solution for Heston Volatility
By definition, a stochastic process {YT : t ≥ 0} is:
• stationary if, for all t1 < t2 < ... < tn and h > 0, the random n−vectors (Yt1 , Yt2 , ..., Ytn) and ¡Yt1+h , Yt2+h , ..., Ytn+h¢ are identically distributed. That is, changes in time do not modify the probability or distribution.
• Gaussian if, for all t1 < t2 < ... < tn, the n vector (Yt1 , Yt2 , ..., Ytn) is multivariate normally distributed.
• Markovian if, for all t1 < t2 < ... < tn, the P (Ytn ≤ y|Yt1 , Yt2 , ..., Ytn−1) = P (Ytn ≤ y|Ytn−1). That is, the future is determined only by the present and not the past.
Also, a process {YT : t ≥ 0} is said to have independent increments if, for all t0 < t1 < t2 < ... < tn, the random variables Yt1 −Yt0 , Yt2 −Yt1 , ..., Ytn −Ytn−1 are independent. This condition implies that {YT : t ≥ 0} is Markovian, but not conversely. Furthermore, the increments are said to be stationary if, for any t > s and h > 0, the distribution of (Yt+h − Ys+h) is the same as the distribution of (Yt − Ys). This additional provision is needed for the following definition. A stochastic process {WT : t ≥ 0} is a Wiener-Lévy process or Brownian motion if it has stationary independent increments, if WT is normally distributed, the E(Wt) = 0 for each t > 0, and if W0 = 0. It then follows that {WT : t ≥ 0} is Gaussian and that Cov(Wt, Ws) = σ2 min {t, s}, where the variance parameter σ2 is a positive constant. Almost all paths of Brownian motion are always continuous but nowhere differentiable. One technical stipulation is required for the following. A stochastic process {YT : t ≥ 0} is continuous in probability if, for all u ε R+ and ε > 0,
P (|Yv − Yu| ≥ ε) --> 0 as v --> u
This holds true if Cov(Yt, Ys) is continuous over R+×R+. Note that this is a statement about distributions, not simple paths. Using these definitions, we can now define our intended topic. A stochastic process {XT : t ≥ 0} is an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process or a Gauss- Markov process if it is stationary, Gaussian, Markovian, and continuous in probability.
Arbitrage Possibility
An arbitrage possibility on a financial market is a self-financed portfolio "h" such that its value "V ” has the following behavior during a period of time:
V h(0) = C, C > 0
V h(T ) > C, − a.s.
We say that the market is arbitrage free if there are no arbitrage possibilities. An arbitrage possibility is thus equivalent to the possibility of making a positive amount of money out of nothing with probability 1 or a.s. (almost sure). It is thus a riskless money making machine or, if you will, a free lunch on the financial market, and our main assumption is that the market is efficient in the sense that no arbitrage is possible. This definition is given by [2].
Prof. Klaus Schmitz

Introduction to Implied, Local and Stochastic Volatility
The purpose of this document is to introduce implied, local and stochastic volatility, to review evidence of non-constant volatility, and to consider the implications for option pricing of alternative random or stochastic volatility models. We focus on continuous time diffusion models for the volatility, but we also briefly discuss certain classes of discrete time models, such as ARV or ARCH.
By Prof. Klaus Erich Schmitz Abe